Suppose a consumer has preferences represented by the utility function
where x,y\geq 0. Let the prices p_x >0, p_y>0 and income M\geq 0 be given.
Solve the consumer’s utility-maximisation problem:
Suppose a consumer has preferences represented by the utility function
where x,y\geq 0. Let the prices p_x >0, p_y>0 and income M\geq 0 be given.
Solve the consumer’s utility-maximisation problem:
X= M-4px+3py/3px
Y= 2M+4px-3py/3py
Problem Statement
We want to maximize u(x,y) = \ln(x + 2) + 2 \ln(y + 3) subject to p_x x + p_y y \le M and x,y \ge 0.
The utility function is strictly increasing in both x and y, and the budget constraint is: p_x x + p_y y = M.
Also, the utility function is strictly quasi-concave and differentiable for all x, y \ge 0. This ensures that if an interior stationary point exists where the tangency condition holds, it represents a global maximum.
First-Order Conditions (Interior Solution)
Now, we find the marginal utilities:
At interior optimum, the Marginal Rate of Substitution equals the price ratio:
Now, we cross-multiply and isolate p_y y:
Now, we substitute above expression for p_y y into the binding budget constraint:
Finally, we isolate x and get the Marshallian demand for x:
Substituting x^* back into the budget constraint to get y we get:
The interior solution (x^*, y^*) is only valid if the non-negativity constraints hold.
For x \ge 0, we need M \ge 4p_x - 3p_y.
For y \ge 0, we need M \ge \frac{3p_y - 4p_x}{2}.
(Note for Amit Sir – Please explain in class how to proceed graphically if M does not satisfy the above condition)
Solving the utility maximisation problem yields the following demand function: